
Re: bad link in Utley commentary @ Matt 11.14
JG wrote:
This is true, I was aware of it, but unless Costas can make the standard verse reference detection include the word "and" we either have to accept these odd cases that are wrong or we don't detect any implicit references at all. We have tended to allow some bad ones to exist.
Thanks for the clarification. It didn't compute the 1st time (my life story).
In a case like this, would it be feasible to explicitly make the
"4:5" appear as
"Mal 4:5"? It is a manual fix but I assume it was a manual fix for "Mal 3:1" too.