|
|
|
Page 1 of 1
|
[ 5 posts ] |
|
Author |
Message |
hsinc1
Joined: Thu Mar 26, 2020 5:31 pm Posts: 2
|
 Misspelling Acts 3:7
Acts 3:7 And he took him by the right hand, and lifted him up: and immediately his feet and ancle bones received strength. Should be Acts 3:7 And he took him by the right hand, and lifted him up: and immediately his feet and ankle bones received strength.
ancle > ankle
|
Thu Mar 26, 2020 5:35 pm |
|
 |
JG
Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2008 7:34 pm Posts: 4144
|
 Re: Misspelling Acts 3:7
There are different spellings of this word, so it is fine in this module.
_________________ Jon theWord 5 Bible Software OS for testing; Windows 10 Beta Download ------Beta Setup Guide------On-line Manual------Tech doc's and Utilities------Copyright Factsheet
|
Thu Mar 26, 2020 5:37 pm |
|
 |
hsinc1
Joined: Thu Mar 26, 2020 5:31 pm Posts: 2
|
 Re: Misspelling Acts 3:7
Sorry, I meant to edit this but had to wait til the POST was approved.
This was in the authorized KJV Module. I checked against E-Sword and a printed copy. When I read the verse this morn for devotions, the word popped out as not spelled right.
Some folks I know are verbal purists and though the word MAY be spelled in other ways, I hold to my POST, in this module - verse, it is misspelled.
But thanks anyway.
|
Fri Mar 27, 2020 1:57 am |
|
 |
mathetes
Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2008 5:08 pm Posts: 321
|
 Re: Misspelling Acts 3:7
That is the correct spelling as found in the 1769 KJV edition and the circa 1900 KJV Cambridge edition.
|
Fri Mar 27, 2020 3:41 pm |
|
 |
malayangbiblia
Joined: Wed Dec 19, 2018 8:27 am Posts: 73 Location: Philippines
|
 Re: Misspelling Acts 3:7
There seems to be a regular update on the KJV text. When I checked on the Trinitarian Bible Society website, they are using a 2019.1.10 date AV text on their online Bible that's published on 2019.10.15. KJV Bibles recently published have "ankle" instead of "ancle" based on what's out there in the internet and several KJV books I have. So, its not clear when or how much changes they did with the spellings in the past century, but this is one good example of those.
It's good, though, to have the original version of 1611 as a point of reference which uses "ancle."
_________________ Thanks,
Edmund
|
Sun Mar 29, 2020 4:55 pm |
|
|
|
Page 1 of 1
|
[ 5 posts ] |
|
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|