JG wrote:I got a reply on the one issue. It is a mistake we made in producing the module, for what I can see.
The reply on the Judges 17:2 was that it is 'Qal Passive'. But we had it as a small q and so just qal. The supplied data shows this ju17:2,7.1 LU75Q.A75X-
[email protected]
Ah, that's interesting - never heard of a Qal Passive so far. Seems to be a debate among scholars (
https://greekandhebrew.wordpress.com/20 ... ive-exist/).
Are you going to fix the bug? There seem to be 69 occurences of a Qal Passive in the WLC (see attached image).
Waiting for a reply on the other point.
Just found out that this is the exact same problem: there is a big "P" in the data, but you just have a small "p". Again, see the attached image.
Maybe there are more bugs like these because of the case insensitivity? Might be good to check the coding in general?!
EDIT: As far as I can see it's the same with Hofal (big "H") and Hifil (small "h").
As to the update, that will be for Costas to decide how best to use the small resources we have. It was a complex job as I recall.
I understand - thanks in advance for a short notification on that.